Case Study

Bail Granted in NDPS Case — Article 21 Liberty Upheld After 3+ Years of Incarceration

Case No. R/CR.MA 23992 of 2024 Court Gujarat High Court, Ahmedabad Date 28 February 2025 (Modified: 07 March 2025) Bench Hon. Justice Ilesh J. Vora Neutral Citation 2025:GUJHC:13429
Bail Application Allowed — Regular Bail Granted

The applicant, Denish Surendra Jota, was arrested on 27 November 2021 in connection with an NDPS case registered at DCB Police Station, Surat, under Sections 8(c) and 22(c) read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was a drug addict who purchased mephedrone from the principal accused and also sold it onwards, with his name appearing in multiple seizure diaries and his contacts linked via CDR analysis.

After an earlier bail application was rejected on merits and a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court was withdrawn, the present successive bail application was filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

  • Nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the applicant — no contraband was directly found on him at the time of arrest.
  • Co-accused persons implicated on the same footing, and some with even more serious charges, had already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of the Gujarat High Court.
  • Out of 312 total witnesses cited across related chargesheets, 61 witnesses were cited against the applicant — yet only 34 had been examined till date, indicating no real prospect of trial concluding within a reasonable timeframe.
  • The applicant had been in continuous judicial custody since 27.11.2021 — over 3 years — making prolonged incarceration a direct violation of his fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
  • The successive bail application was maintainable as a subsequent event — co-accused with similar roles had been released — constituting a fresh ground not available at the time of the earlier application.

The Hon’ble Court held that the successive bail application was maintainable in view of the subsequent event of co-accused persons with similar roles being released on bail. On merits, the Court noted the complete absence of any possibility of trial concluding within a reasonable time, given the sheer volume of witnesses and the pace of proceedings before the Special NDPS Court, Surat.

Relying on Ravi Prakash v. State of Odisha (2023 SCC Online SC 1109), the Court affirmed that prolonged incarceration militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, and that in such situations, conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act.

The application was allowed. The applicant was ordered to be released on regular bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the following conditions:

  • Shall not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty.
  • Shall not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution.
  • Shall surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within one week.
  • Shall not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned.
  • Shall furnish latest residential address to the Investigating Officer and the Court, and shall not change residence without prior permission of the Trial Court.
  • Shall not leave Surat City till conclusion of trial without prior permission of the court concerned.
View Full Judgment (PDF)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *